Less than a month after the Supreme Court's decision, Delaware moved to fully legalize sports betting. Three casinos began operating sportsbooks in June and the state is looking to add additional locations as well as mobile betting. Florida Man is not allowed to legally gamble in-state. Three bills filed in November aim to get movement rolling on the legalization of in-state wagering. Proposed legislation filed in early would allow for sports betting on pro and college sports, but with no more than 10 sports gambling licenses handed out in the state.
A bill proposed in January of would allow for the regulation of sports gambling through a newly-established corporation. Legislation was passed in June to allow sports gambling, though in-state collegiate games will be off-limits under the new law. It will make gambling lawful in a variety of locations both in-person including at Wrigley Field and online. Bets were allowed in the state as of March 9, Wagering on pro and college sports became legal in September of with both mobile and in-person betting permitted at multiple locations.
Iowa legalized sports gambling in , with multiple sites beginning to take bets at the end of that summer. State law allows for betting on both pro and college sports. A total of five sports betting bills have been proposed in the Kansas legislature, but none currently have a hearing date set. Kentucky has had multiple sports gambling bills proposed but likely won't see any movement until at least Maine nearly passed a law that would have allowed in-person and mobile sports betting on pro and college sports with the exception of in-state colleges , but the bill was vetoed by the state's governor.
The state's legislature will likely look to get an identical or similar version passed in A number of sports betting legalization bills were introduced in , including one from the governor that would allow residents anywhere in the state to place mobile sports wagers not tied to land-based casinos or bet in-person at two newly opened in-state casinos. If passed, the state could see legalized betting as early as Casinos in the state started taking wagers in March of In , a bill was proposed that would have legalized sports gambling at the state's two horse-racing tracks, its 21 tribal casinos and potentially through mobile devices.
That bill did not pass during that legislative session. The first sports bets in Mississippi were placed on August 1, The state enacted a law in that allowed for sports betting. Missouri had several sports betting bills introduced this year but the state hasn't taken action on them yet. Legal sports betting arrived in the state as of March Sportsbooks will be regulated through the state lottery.
In the election, Nebraska authorized adding casino games at its horse racing tracks. In early , state senator Justin Wayne introduced a bill classifying sports betting as "authorized games of skill" and would allow sports wagering, fantasy sports, and poker in Nebraska.
New Hampshire joined the list of states with legalized sports betting on the second day of The state agreed to a six-year contract with DraftKings, so mobile sportsbooks can be utilized throughout the state. New Jersey long advocated for legalized sports gambling and was responsible for the case that led to the federal reversal from the Supreme Court.
As such, they wasted no time in legalizing sports gambling after the decision, opening the state's first sportsbooks on June 14, New Mexico's case is rather unique, as the state hasn't passed legislation specifically allowing sports betting, but it's possible to legally bet in-state thanks to a loophole. Under the current state laws, sports betting isn't explicitly prohibited, nor is it a prohibited Class III game in the gaming compacts shared between tribes and the state.
This has allowed the Pueblo of Santa Ana tribe to open their own not-outright-legal-but-also-not-technically-illegal sportsbook at its in-state casino. New York actually passed a bill in that made sports gambling legal at the state level, but the state didn't open its first official sportsbook until July of Gambling in North Carolina is run exclusively through the Cherokee tribe, and the state passed a bill in July of that will permit sports gambling including horse racing to be part of that monopoly.
As it stands, sports bets will only be accepted in-person at the tribe's two casinos, both of which would like to start taking bets n Lawmakers emphatically rejected a bill to legalize professional and collegiate sports betting in Legislation has been proposed in Ohio but lawmakers are at odds over the regulation and oversight of sports gambling.
Overall, D. It will never rival some of the larger markets, but bettors at least have several legal options to place a bet from anywhere within the state. Louisiana is the first to approve sports betting at a county or parish level, so it remains to be seen what sports betting will look like when it launches in or Lawmakers will also need to determine key regulatory details — including allowing online access — which could be a complex legislative process.
Retail casinos will almost assuredly be able to open retail sportsbooks as early as , but it remains to be seen how or if online wagering would be conducted in Louisiana. The voters of Maryland said yes to legalizing sports gambling in the Nov. But there is widespread, bipartisan support for online and retail betting , meaning Marylanders should expect the launch of a competitive, digital marketplace as early as North Carolina legalized in-person sports betting in July for two tribal casinos in the western portion of the state, but both are still working towards opening their respective sportsbooks.
While that bill did not permit any mobile wagering, the state is expected to consider statewide mobile wagering in Lawmakers still need to pass follow-up legislation, but bettors should expect retail books to open in the historic gaming community of Deadwood as well as tribal casinos as early as The state constitution only permits wagering within Deadwood and tribal lands, but some believe statewide mobile wagering could be approved as long as the servers are placed in Deadwood.
This is far from a sure bet, but could open an interesting new digital market. Washington legalized sports betting on March 25, , though no bets have been taken because the state is in compact negotiations with tribal representatives to come up with terms of a new agreement that will allow sports betting to take place on tribal lands.
Arizona officials have touched on sports betting proposals the last few years and are still considering a path for state tribes to take sports bets. Key details would still need to be resolved, but officials from both parties are bullish on a deal, possibly as early as Online betting may be a tougher endeavor, but Arizona seems on solid footing for some sort of legal wagering sooner than later.
With politicians largely supportive, Connecticut remains one of the more plausible states to pass a sports betting bill. But until, or if, stakeholders can reach a deal, sports betting remains illegal. Some Florida politicians have come out in support of legal wagering, but a host of legal and logistical obstacles have thwarted any legislative efforts. Miami-based sports betting legislation expert Daniel Wallach said a constitutional amendment that prohibits lawmakers from passing gaming legislation without a voter referendum would not necessarily stop the legislature from authorizing sports gambling.
It could still be a major legal stumbling block. The other major concern is the interests of the Seminole Tribe of Florida. Though the Seminoles would almost assuredly support the right to open sportsbooks in Florida, as they have in other states, any authorization would have to come on their terms, which may not include online betting. Meanwhile, the state continues a multi-year standoff over slot machine tax payments and exclusivity rights that also will need to be settled before sports betting authorization can take shape.
Polls in Georgia say that voters are in favor of legalized sports betting. A last-minute legalization bill failed in the final moments of the legislative session, but legal betting could get another look in Brian Kemp might also be a veto threat to sports gambling progress. As we saw during the November election, though, Georgia seems to be trending more and more politically blue every year. Kansas seemed like a safe bet to approval legal wagering in after both the House and Senate introduced bills to do so.
The progress is an encouraging sign, and it appears the idea of sports betting has gained support in Kansas. Key regulatory issues will need to be resolved, and it remains to be seen if online betting is politically palatable, but Kansas could be among the favorites to pass legal retail betting as early as A sports betting bill zoomed out a legislative committee in the Kentucky House in early , but quickly hit a snag as Republican leadership tanked the bill despite bipartisan support.
Conservative, anti-gambling sentiment runs deep in Kentucky and remains a massive political barrier. The good news is that Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear is a big proponent of sports betting legalization, but until Republicans get on board, Kentucky sports betting may not happen. In that environment, it makes statewide mobile wagering even more difficult. Governor vetoed bill A Maine online sports betting bill seemed like a sure bet until Gov.
Janet Mills vetoed what would have been the most competitive market in New England. A veto override fell a few votes short, but sports betting backers are hoping to work with Mills on a new sports betting bill in Republican Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker and members of both parties in the Democrat-controlled General Court support sports betting. Elected officials have not reached consensus on several key issues, such as which entities would be allowed to take bets and if legal betting should include wagers on in-state college teams.
Legal betting should come to Massachusetts in the next two years. Multiple bills floated through the legislature but were dropped when the session ended early, and there are three new bills on the table now. Expect to see some action in for both online and in-person wagering — especially if Kansas is close to doing the same.
This would likely mean retail only, but North Dakota could be among a rare group of states that can take bets without an act of the legislature. Lawmakers held out hope for a bill in the final moments of , but it seems more likely a fresh set of legislators will have to take a new bill when the session begins. Legal wagering has widespread bipartisan support in the legislative and executive branches, but politicians still need to hammer out a few issues that have stalled legislation for months.
Texas would appear to be an unlikely sports betting adopter, but a dire budget situation and investment from outside gaming interests make it a possible target in The Lone Star State is still a longshot , but the pressures of the session the legislature only meets regularly in odd-numbered years could move Texas past its long-standing gambling opposition. Vermont is one of the few remaining states without casinos, but it may be okay with legal sportsbooks, at least online. The state is considering a study bill and may feel pressured to accept wagering especially as the greater New England market continues to grow.
Lawmakers seem unlikely to take up a sports betting bill anytime soon, but the Northern Arapaho Tribe appears it may add retail sports betting under the authority of existing law, much in the way tribes in New Mexico are operating sports betting without any legislation. Alaska is pretty much nowhere on sports gambling. The 49th state might actually be the 49th to legalize it, if ever.
Alabama is one of the few remaining states without a lottery and seems unlikely to thaw its gambling opposition. The legislature had a sports betting bill in the works in March before COVID ended the session early that would have included both in-person and online sports betting, but passing such a bill is still a difficult task in a state with strong gaming aversions.
California sports betting looks like it will be a reality, but only at tribal casinos and most likely not until State tribes are close to finalizing a ballot measure that would allow sportsbooks on tribal grounds. Wagering could begin as early as if approved, but in-person only and not online.
A proposal that would have allowed mobile sports betting while granting extend gaming options to the state commercial cardrooms fell short. With potentially billions of dollars at stake, gaming interests will still pursue California mobile betting, but it appears the tribal casino-only option is the most likely reality for a legal wagering market. Hawaii is one of just two states currently without any major gambling entity of any kind, and it seems sports betting will not be coming to the state for the foreseeable future, if ever.
State laws as written are currently against gambling, save for horse racing. Lawmakers have considered sports betting bills in recent years, but the state has not worked out how it would work, and which entities, most notably Minnesota Native American tribes, would be allowed to take bets. Oklahoma gaming is dominated by Native American entities and most seem disinclined to agree to sports betting until other key issues with the state government are resolved.
Two tribes struck sports betting deals in , but those were later invalidated, part of a larger conflict between competition gaming interests and the government. A court ruling that renewed a previous compact between the two entities gives tribes the upper hand in negotiations with the government.
Several bills have been introduced in the past in South Carolina, but none have gained any traction. Sports betting is likely never coming to Utah, the only state in the continental U. Sports Betting. Best Books. Credit: Sports betting legalization map.
Ryan Butler. Download App. Updated Feb. Despite these positive developments, there are still federal laws on the book regarding sports wagering. Both are limited in their application to gambling operators physically located within the United States, so bettors are still able to freely gamble despite those laws.
As sports betting continues to become a more widely accepted in American culture, these laws will undoubtedly evolve, and they will likely eventually be repealed. Although no American laws prevent you from gambling, it would still benefit you to learn about them.
Information is power, after all. The rest of that action was either going underground or being sent to offshore sportsbooks which, despite PASPA and other US anti-gambling laws, were and are able to operate legally, as they are based overseas and outside of US jurisdiction.
Naturally, PASPA has been something of a massive financial boondoggle for the US, and now that the law is overturned, there is hope that much of that action being sent overseas can be recovered and kept in the US economy. Good riddance to bad rubbish! Like most federal sports betting laws, the UIGEA only applies to businesses and not the individuals placing bets. The law is further neutered by the advent of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which allow bettors to fund their accounts and receive payouts without ever going through a banking service on either end.
All in all, the UIGEA is the poster child for ineffective legislation to address nonexistent problems. Indeed, there is some debate about the origin of Bitcoin itself, with many analysts claiming that the catalysts for its creation were the strict sports betting laws in the United States. While this received some notable support in the legislature after its initial proposal in co-sponsored by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and Utah representative Jason Chaffetz , the bill gained no support and never advanced.
The necessity for RAWA, in effect, at least temporarily obviated when the DOJ, in , reversed course, stating that the original Wire Act did indeed apply to all common forms of gambling. This, it seems, has deprioritized the issue, albeit a DOJ statement is not nearly as binding as an official law and, as shown, can be reversed at any time.
Lobbyist and casino magnate Sheldon Adelson was the main driving force behind RAWA, as online gambling threatens his land-based casino interests. Kennedy at the behest of his brother Robert F. Sold to the public as a means to stop the proliferation of mafia-related numbers rackets across state borders, the real impetus for the very first of the US sports betting laws was to stop sports gambling and underground lotteries from competing with state-sanctioned lotteries.
Naturally, the states could not abide competition in this arena, as their own lotteries provided huge amounts of income to fund their programs and schemes. Indeed, semaphore is even outlawed! Naturally, with the advent of the Internet, this new communications form, traveling over wires, was also covered by the Wire Act, as is wireless wagering in our modern times. The only real effect of the Wire Act now, however, is that it prevents residents in one state from picking up the phone or logging onto the Internet to place a sports bet in another state.
As the law was established in the s, it is quite outdated, yet the US government still uses it to crack down on gambling establishments. In short, this law prevents sportsbooks from accepting a wager from those who are not physically located within the state — and this includes the use of mobile betting.
The Wire Act does not target the gambler, so those who are attempting to wager from outside of state lines should not worry, but instead, it focuses on the sportsbook itself. This law was established to prevent mobsters and underground sports betting operations from hiding their money and transferring it across state lines.
While this is not the issue that the law control today, it still holds true and may inhibit your ability to bet on sports. As for the offshore betting sites, this US law has zero jurisdiction over the overseas sportsbooks, so they will accept bettors from anywhere within the US. Perhaps the most important law in the sports betting world, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of PASPA seemed like the end of the gambling industry in the country.
This law in order to protect the integrity of professional and collegiate sports made it that states could not offer a state-operated sports betting industry. States like Nevada, Delaware, Oregon, and Montana were exempt from this law, as they already had sports betting laws on their books and were grandfathered in. However, as Nevada was the only state that accepted single-game wagering and not a parlay style game, it quickly became the sports betting monopoly it is known for.
Now that PASPA has been repealed May , states have the right to facilitate their own sports betting laws and regulate their own industry how they see fit. With PASPA gone, many states were quick to legalize sports betting and a handful more are researching the best methods to bring the industry into a tax contributing necessity. This law being repealed is the only reason why the sports betting market has continued to grow immensely since Designed to scare bettors, this law worked for many years until sports bettors realized just exactly what the law entailed.
This includes sports betting sites as well as horse racing betting sites and even online casinos. UIGEA may be a deterrent for sports bettors but there are many ways around it. To know if you have been a victim of UIGEA is quite easy, as your credit card will be declined when you attempt to deposit with one of our recommended sites.
Instead, call up the desired sportsbook and they will explain their various deposit and withdrawal methods that are welcomed without a bank being the middle man. Methods like Bitcoin, Money Orders, and other possibilities exist, as the sportsbook and the gambler can make their connection and get you, the sports bettor, started.
This can cause for very different industries offered despite states being neighbors to each other. Visit BetDSI. Legal Sports Betting Across The Nation As of , there are 19 states in the country that have launched some form of state-sanctioned legal sports betting. Player Bonus Go To U.
Visit BetOnline. Visit MyBookie. Visit Sportsbetting. Visit Bovada. Visit XBet. Dozens of states across the country are prepared to move forward quickly to offer sports betting in the wake of the court's decision.
New Jersey and then-Gov. Chris Christie challenged the federal ban, arguing that it violated the Tenth Amendment, which the Supreme Court has said prohibits federal laws that compel states to carry out federal dictates. The gambling law, Christie said, commandeered the states by forcing them to prohibit sports wagering. A great day for the rights of states and their people to make their own decisions. New Jersey citizens wanted sports gambling and the federal Gov't had no right to tell them no.
The Supreme Court agrees with us today. I am proud to have fought for the rights of the people of NJ. New Jersey's current governor, Phil Murphy, said he was "thrilled" by the ruling and would work with state lawmakers to enact a law authorizing sports betting "in the very near future.
Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito said the problem with the federal law is that "state legislatures are put under the direct control of Congress. New Jersey wants to allow limited forms of sports gambling and to collect the taxes from it.
But we know a little bit. And the fact is that organized crime is involved in profiting from this every day," he said.